As for the SNR Weight metric, I am new to all of this, and my first experience, although couched in the semi-subjective comparison to FWHM, (gradients are usually not much of an issue for me in my skies and chosen shooting conditions...), seemed to …
I find FWHM to be useful to determine whether I should keep shooting, and for culling out frames with wind gusts or cable snags or just passing bad seeing conditions.
So to re-state that thought, FWHM may not be the best way to weight frames, but i…
So I think, (?), I've answered part of my question, which is that , yes, the subs must be star aligned/registered. This is not intuitive in some ways because other weighting occurs before registration. Also, the fact that the script does photometry/…
And as a side note, there seems like there may be a bias, (lowercase "b", not the calibration frame), amongst those who can afford fancy CCD cameras against the idiosyncrasies of some of the newer affordable CMOS cameras.
When I go through the tuto…
But there is no issue with using Flat Darks instead of Bias to calibrate Flats, right?
I takes ~5 minutes extra to shoot Flat Darks after shooting Flats, so not a huge time savings, and I have heard (so much hearsay, but nonetheless...), that Bias …