I've been following the Fundamentals Path combined with Workflow Examples to work on processing my first image from raw data through, eventually "World-Class Beautiful Image." I'm up to the Stretch Academy now and am learning a ton.
Now, I'll admit that I probably should have chosen an easier dataset for my first real foray into processing, but I'm working on M13. I've been using some of your galaxy workflow examples as guides because some of the problems are similar (REALLY bright core, but external detail you want to capture) but am having trouble bringing out that nice sandy texture in the core while still getting the fainter stars (and the little galaxy in the background).
I went through all of your examples and I see nebulae and galaxies, but I don't seen and globs. Is there one that I'm just missing? Or are they so uninteresting that I'm kind of on my own here?
Mark
Comments
Thank you. Is the Deep Sky Academy going to be part of Fundamentals or Horizons?
Mark
Now I'm sure that part of this is because the entire site and course selection has grown and morphed into something well beyond what was originally envisioned. The collection kind of grew based on demand but wasn't really subject to any kind of master plan and you are now trying to take what you have and create some kind of structure to it. On top of that, you spend a LOT of time on these products and providing support and you deserve to be compensated for what you provide.
I have no idea what you are planning, but if I may suggest that in addition to your individual course sales, you provide some kind of tiered subscription scheme where you would get access to a set of content based on the subscription tier. For example (pricing and content completely made up here):
Beginner Subscription $75/year. Access to all Fast Track, WBPP, and basic stretching content (STF and HT).
Intermediate Tier: $150/year. All Beginner material plus DBE, Stretch Academy, Color Correction material.
Expert Tier: $225/year. All Intermediate Material plus Pixel Math, Blending, and Advanced Color Work, and a variety of Workflow Examples.
Master Tier: $300/year. All site material.
Just an idea.
The tiers were examples and take into account the fact that many of the subjects get revisited. Gee, I forgot how to do something in WBPP and need to go back and figure it out or hmmm, I haven't used Masked Stretch in a long time and I'd like to review as I'm working on this galaxy, etc. Although I see your point about the lower tier, I view it differently. It is your gateway drug. You do the up front tier and either find you want to learn more (in which case you upgrade) or you find this isn't for you in which case you aren't using PixInsight at all. Sure, there is probably a population in the middle, but the majority of the users are probably in those two categories. The meat is the second and third tiers.
What I don't particularly care for is the fact that it looks like you'd need 3 different subscriptions to have access to everything. That is the beauty of a tiered system is that you get lower level tiers included in a single product and it limits management overhead. You don't have to manage multiple products, just different flavors of the same product.
Good to know the courses will be lifetime memberships. What about Horizons? Will it switch over to be a lifetime membership, or will this be transferred to the same recurring yearly fee that Horizons is now, albeit in a different subscription tier?
What do I purchase to be able to see all current and past content and all future content?
I want access to everything Adam has published and will publish.
That's the only subscription I'm interested in.
I agree that some kind of "get everything" purchase would be amazing. That being said, the way he has it planned seems to be a very good balance between providing what we, the users, want but keeping Adam's overhead manageable. Heck, this is Adam Block Studios, not Adam Block Incorporated. He's one guy, not a team of 20.
I suspect that once the new site is up, there will be some evolution based on core user feedback, but his ideas are good and will bring some badly needed organization to the mass of videos he currently has available.
Mark
Mark