It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I am having a problem with horizontal banding on my DSO images that as been getting worse and I can’t seem to find a reason or a cure for.
My equipment:
ZWO ASI533MC-Pro w/ L-eXtreme filter
Williams Optics ZS 81 w/ Hotech field flattener
iOptron CEM40 EQ mount
Guide: ZWO ASI120-s / 30F4 mini scope
Focus Cube 2
Pegasus Astro Power Box - sits on the scope for cable control including 2 dew heaters.
Computer control: Minix computer running Windows 10 Pro that sits on a stand under the tripod. I use Microsoft Remote Desktop on my MacMini w/ Satechi hub to view NINA as well as do all processing & editing on the Mac.
Data collection software: NINA
Processing software: PixInsight & Capture 1.
The banding is present on all master & single calibration frames. I have looked at darks taken at multiple exposure times as well as the most recently taken and older (2022) ones. I have looked at light frames from older DSO’s to most recent, before and after WBPP. I have also gone back and checked lights to when I first got my ASI533 and while still present it is much worse now than when the camera was new (bought 03.23.2022). It also is much worse on Nebula images than on Galaxy and SNR images. In all fairness I am now imaging more difficult and fainter targets that do require more stretching which may account for my newer nebula images having worse banding, but the fact that it is on almost all my images is disconcerting. I have tried the CanonBandingReducer script and it slightly fades them or moves them around but does not get rid of them.
From everything I have tried it seems like it may be a camera problem. I have heard some the ASI533’s are known for banding problems but my mentor has both the MC-Pro and MM and has no issues.
Have you heard of this with ZWO cameras? Do you have any suggestions as to what may be the cause or anything I can do to mitigate the banding either in data collection or processing?
I've included a processed image with the banding.
Comments